Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis HUFF, Defendant-Appellant.
Louis Huff negotiated a plea agreement with the government under which he agreed to plead guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). As part of that deal, Huff broadly agreed to waive his right to appeal his sentence in exchange for the government’s promises to take certain actions at sentencing. The district court accepted Huff’s guilty plea and then sentenced him to 150 months of imprisonment, within the guideline range of 135 to 168 months. Huff now appeals his sentence, arguing that his sentence is unreasonably high. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver. We grant the government’s motion.
We will enforce an appeal waiver that was made knowingly and voluntarily. United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1294 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993). To prove that a waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily, the government must show that (1) the district court specifically questioned the defendant about the waiver during the plea colloquy; or (2) the record makes clear that the defendant otherwise understood the full significance of the waiver. Bushert, 997 F.2d at 1351.
We enforce the waiver in Huff’s plea agreement. First, we find that the waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily. Huff was specifically questioned about the terms of the waiver, including its exceptions, during the plea colloquy, and Huff confirmed that he understood the waiver and had discussed it with his attorney.
Second, no exception to the waiver applies. By agreeing to the waiver, Huff waived the right to appeal unless (a) the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum, (b) the sentence exceeded the guideline range, or (c) the government appealed. Because Huff’s sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum or his guideline range and the government has not appealed, the waiver bars this appeal.
For these reasons, we GRANT the government’s motion to dismiss Huff’s appeal based on the sentence-appeal waiver in his plea agreement.
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-15798
Decided: June 14, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)