SOPO v. ATTORNEY GENERAL DC (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Maxi Dinga SOPO, Petitioner–Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ice Field Office Director, Atlanta Region, Stewart DC Warden, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 14-11421

Decided: May 17, 2018

Before: JILL PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges, and CONWAY,* District Judge.

David Charles Frederick, Joshua D. Branson, Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner–Appellant. Hans Harris Chen, J. Max Weintraub, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Jeffrey S. Robins, U.S. Department of Justice, OIL–District Court Section, Washington, DC, Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, Pope McGlamry Kilpatrick Morrison & Norwood, PC, Atlanta, GA, Sheetul S. Wall, U.S. Attorney's Office, Columbus, GA, for Respondent–Appellee U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL. Jeffrey S. Robins, U.S. Department of Justice, OIL–District Court Section, Washington, DC, Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, Pope McGlamry Kilpatrick Morrison & Norwood, PC, Atlanta, GA, Sheetul S. Wall, U.S. Attorney's Office, Columbus, GA, for Respondents–Appellees SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, ATLANTA REGION, STEWART DC WARDEN. Michael K.T. Tan, Judy Rabinovitz, ACLU Foundation, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION. Eunice Hyunhye Cho, Southern Poverty Law Center, Atlanta, GA, Rebecca Sharpless, University of Miami School of Law, Coral Gables, FL, Michael S. Vastine, St. Thomas University School of Law, Miami Gardens, FL, for Amicus Curiae ALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE. Rebecca Sharpless, University of Miami School of Law, Coral Gables, FL, for Amicus Curiae 31 SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCHERS AND PROFESSORS, ET AL.

On June 15, 2016, this Court published a decision vacating the district court's March 4, 2014, order dismissing Appellant's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus and remanded. Sopo v. U.S. Att'y Gen., 825 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2016). On August 8, 2016, Appellees' filed a petition for panel rehearing, which we stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Jennings v. Rodriguez, ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 830, 200 L.Ed.2d 122 (2018), which issued on February 27, 2018. Following the issuance of Rodriguez, we directed the parties to file supplemental briefing addressing that decision's impact on this case. Those briefs have not been filed yet.

Instead, the Appellees' filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot and vacate this Court's above June 15, 2016 published decision. Appellees assert that Sopo was removed from the United States on January 24, 2018 and is no longer detained in immigration custody. As such, Appellees assert that Sopo's challenge to his immigration detention is now moot and request that we dismiss this appeal as moot and vacate our June 15, 2016 decision.

In a response to the Appellees' motion, Appellant notes that he received a bond hearing shortly after our June 15, 2016 published decision and confirms that he was removed from the United States in January 2018. Appellant further “agrees that his appeal in this case has become moot,” and states that he “does not oppose vacatur of the panel's decision.”

Appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal as moot is GRANTED. Our June 15, 2016, published decision is hereby VACATED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law