Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Frank LOPEZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Giraldo Lopez, Magaly Nunez-Delgado, individually and as assignee of Michelle Soto, Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross Appellants, v. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant Cross Appellee.
This appeal arises out of a seven-day jury trial concerning claims for bad faith under Florida common law. Appellees/Cross-Appellants Frank Lopez, as executor for the estate of Giraldo Lopez (“Lopez's estate”), and Magaly Nunez-Delgado, individually and as assignee of Michelle Soto, brought these claims against Appellant/Cross-Appellee Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (“Allstate”). The jury returned a unanimous verdict, finding that Allstate did not act in bad faith by failing to settle the claim of Lopez's estate but that it acted in bad faith by failing to the settle the claim of Magaly Nunez-Delgado. Subsequent to trial, the district court entered a final judgment in favor of Allstate against Lopez's estate and in favor of Nunez-Delgado against Allstate.
In an omnibus order filed thereafter, the district court denied various post-trial motions filed by the parties. The district court later amended its judgment to include, inter alia, damages for Nunez-Delgado in the amount of $315,000.00, plus prejudgment interest of $40,486.59.
Allstate appeals the district court's final judgment, omnibus order, and amended final judgment entered in favor of Nunez-Delgado. Lopez's estate and Nunez-Delgado appeal the district court's omnibus order and amended final judgment claiming, inter alia, that the district court's jury charge and verdict form erroneously separated the claim into two bad faith claims, and that Nunez-Delgado is entitled to prejudgment interest from an earlier date.
After careful review, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in any of the district court's rulings or its jury instructions and affirm the final judgment, the amended final judgment, and the omnibus order.
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-16506
Decided: February 07, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)