MARK AMAR v. TANYA DAVIS WILSON (2017)

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Mark S. Amar failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules, effective January 25, 2017.

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

by: David L. Thomas, AA, Deputy Clerk

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith Clerk of Court

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

January 25, 2017

Sheryl L. Loesch

U.S. District Court

401 W CENTRAL BLVD

ORLANDO, FL 32801

Appeal Number: 16-16041-AA

Case Style: Mark Amar v. Tanya Wilson

District Court Docket No: 6:16-cv-00720-GKS-KRS

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Entry of Dismissal for failure to prosecute in the above referenced appeal is issued as the mandate of this court. See 11th Cir. R. 41-4. Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c) and 42-3(c), when an appellant fails to timely file or correct a brief or appendix, the appeal shall be treated as dismissed on the first business day following the due date. This appeal was treated as dismissed on 01/03/2017.

Counsel and pro se parties are advised that pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 25(a)(2)(A), a motion to set aside the dismissal and remedy the default “is not timely unless the clerk receives the papers within the time fixed for filing.”

All pending motions are now rendered moot in light of the attached order.

Sincerely,

DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court

Reply to: David L. Thomas, AA/lt

Phone #: (404) 335-6169

Enclosure(s)

DIS-2CIV Letter and Entry of Dismissal