Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EX PARTE MELISSA ELIZABETH LUCIO, Applicant
CONCURRING OPINION
The child victim was beaten to death. Bruising and other injuries could be seen across the child's entire body—on the head, neck, back, buttocks, chest, arms, hands, legs, and feet. These injuries also included bite marks and missing hair from the scalp. The emergency-room doctor said that, in his 30 years of practice, the child's injuries—covering over 90% of the child's body—were “the absolute worst that I've ever seen.”
Applicant maintained that the head injuries that led to the child's death were accidental—due to a fall from a stairway—but this story evolved over time. Regardless of which version of her story one examines, however, none can explain the widespread nature of the injuries, nor can they explain certain specific types of injuries the child suffered—being bitten and having her hair pulled out. Paramedics found Applicant's demeanor to be unusually calm for a parent whose child was dead or on the verge of death, and Applicant told her younger sister over the phone, “Don't blame Robert. This was me. I did it.” And in an interview with the police, Applicant admitted to causing a majority of the child's various injuries, including pinching the groin, hard spanks to the body, and bite marks on the back.
Judge Richardson's comprehensive concurring opinion delves into the detail on why Applicant's claims lack merit, and I highly recommend reading it. But because a picture can be worth a thousand words, I also attach some photos depicting the child's injuries (see Appendix). With these comments, I join the Court in denying relief.
Appendix
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Tabular or graphical material not displayable at this time.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. WR-72,702-05
Decided: September 24, 2026
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)