Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ex parte Wesley Lynn Ruiz
ORDER
This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5.1
In 2008, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted under Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Ruiz v. State, No. AP–75,965 (Tex.Crim.App. Oct. 28, 2009)(not designated for publication), cert. denied, 132 S.Ct. 402 (2011). Applicant filed his initial post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus in the convicting court in 2010, and this Court denied relief in 2012. Ex parte Ruiz, No. WR–78,129–01 (Tex.Crim.App. September 26, 2012)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed a subsequent application while the first application was pending, and this Court dismissed that application. Ex parte Ruiz, Nos. WR–78,129–02 (Tex.Crim.App. September 26, 2012)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus in the convicting court on September 26, 2013. The convicting court forwarded this application to this Court, where it was received on July 25, 2014. Art. 11.071, § 5(b)(1).
We have reviewed this subsequent application and find that the allegations fail to satisfy the requirements of Article 11.071, § 5(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the application as an abuse of the writ without considering the merits of the claims. Art. 11.071, § 5(c).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FOOTNOTES
1. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Articles are to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
Per curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. WR–78,129–03
Decided: November 19, 2014
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)