Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ex parte Sidney Earl BRASHEAR, Appellant.1
OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant appealed the denial of pre-trial habeas corpus relief. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of relief. Brashear v. State, 985 S.W.2d 474 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st], 1998). Appellant's motion for rehearing was overruled on March 9, 1998, and he filed a petition for discretionary review on April 8, 1998, No. 773-98. On May 21, 1998, the Court of Appeals issued a “Corrected Opinion,” withdrawing its earlier opinion of February 12. Appellant filed another petition for discretionary review “to protect his rights” after noting that the court's opinion of May 21st was not timely under Tex.R.App.Pro. 50.
This Court refused Appellant's first petition for discretionary review on June 24, 1998. We have now received Appellant's second petition for discretionary review, which is identical to the first. We refuse Appellant's second petition for discretionary review, but grant review of the case on our own motion to address the authority of the Court of Appeals to issue its corrected opinion of May 21st.
The Court of Appeals' “Corrected Opinion” was untimely under rule 50 because it was issued more than 30 days after Appellant's petition for discretionary review had been filed. See Garza v. State, 896 S.W.2d 192 (Tex.Cr.App.1995). Accordingly, the court had no jurisdiction to issue that opinion. Therefore, the Court of Appeals' corrected opinion issued on May 21, 1998, is vacated, and the original judgment of the Court of Appeals that issued on February 12, 1998, is reinstated.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1182-98.
Decided: October 21, 1998
Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas,En Banc.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)