EX PARTE MEDGER CHAUNCEY DUCKENS v. << (2022)

CONCURRING OPINION

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 4, 2022.

I respectfully concur. The majority opinion discusses whether the State's conduct in this case is substantially unconstitutional, thus implying that there is a permissible category of unconstitutional restrictions because they do not constitute a “substantial” violation. Because I believe that all unconstitutional restrictions should have a remedy but that the State's actions are not unconstitutional in this case, I concur.

Meagan Hassan Justice