EX PARTE MEDGER CHAUNCEY DUCKENS v. << (2022)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

EX PARTE MEDGER CHAUNCEY DUCKENS, Appellant

NO. 14-21-00576-CR

Decided: October 04, 2022

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan (Jewell, J., majority).

CONCURRING OPINION

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 4, 2022.

I respectfully concur. The majority opinion discusses whether the State's conduct in this case is substantially unconstitutional, thus implying that there is a permissible category of unconstitutional restrictions because they do not constitute a “substantial” violation. Because I believe that all unconstitutional restrictions should have a remedy but that the State's actions are not unconstitutional in this case, I concur.

Meagan Hassan Justice

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network