Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DOUGLAS RAY MADISON, Appellant v. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from the county court's ruling on an appeal of a justice court judgment seizing ten dogs and two cats. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss claiming this Court has no jurisdiction over this appeal based on Section 821.025(e) of the Texas Health and Safety Code. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 821.025(e).
Section 821.025(e) provides that the decision by the county court to divest an owner of ownership of an animal under Section 821.023 “is final and may not be further appealed.” Id. Thus, appellant may not appeal the county court's ruling to this Court.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 01-17-00675-CV
Decided: October 05, 2017
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)