Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MELINDA BYERS, Relator
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is relator's July 28, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in which she complains of the trial court's May 1, 2017 order striking relator's intervention in a suit to adopt a child. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Although orders striking an intervention are generally reviewable through mandamus, such pretrial orders become appealable when a final judgment is signed. See, e.g., In re Bradberry, No. 12-12-00121-CV, 2012 WL 3201927, at *2 (Tex. App.—Tyler Aug. 8, 2012, orig. proceeding). Relator avers that the trial court signed a final order of adoption on May 5, 2017. Relator, therefore, has an adequate remedy by appeal. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002; see In re Thomas, No. 09-15-00240, 2015 WL 3756834, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont June 16, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (holding that the relator had an adequate remedy by appeal because the trial court had signed a final appealable judgment). Failing to timely file a notice of appeal does not render appeal an inadequate remedy. See In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 96 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding.) (denying mandamus relief because remedy by appeal was not inadequate even if relator filed notice of appeal untimely); see also In re Telkamp, No. 05-04-00839-CV, 2004 WL 1434791, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 28, 2004, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (untimely notice of appeal did not mean relator lacked adequate remedy at law). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 05-17-00883-CV
Decided: August 04, 2017
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)