IN THE INTEREST OF CHILD v. << (2017)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court's April 3, 2017 judgment terminating appellant's parental rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4. The notice of appeal was due no later than April 24, 2017 or, with a timely extension motion reasonably explaining the need for the extension, May 9, 2017, see id. 4.1(a), 10.5(b), 26.1(b), 26.3. Appellant's notice of appeal was filed May 1, 2017, but without an extension motion. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the extension period, we allowed appellant an opportunity to remedy the timeliness problem by filing an extension motion no later than May 18, 2017. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). To date, however, appellant has not responded.

Because the timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional and an appellate court may not extend the filing deadline if no reasonable explanation is provided for needing the extension, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 10.5(b), 26.3; Garza v. Hibernia Nat'l Bank, 227 S.W.3d 233, 233 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.).

DAVID EVANS JUSTICE