Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jacob Daniel PULLEN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
DISSENTING OPINION
I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that section 43.26 of the Texas Penal Code, as in effect in 2019, is ambiguous. I would conclude that each thumbnail image is a separate “visual material” as defined by section 43.26(b)(3)(B). Thus, I believe seven separate crimes were committed. I would hold the evidence is sufficient to affirm all seven judgments.
Opinion by: Velia J. Meza, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 04-24-00713-CR
Decided: July 01, 2026
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)