Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SHARON LEE WALLACE-GARZA & ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant v. IRMA GARZA, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk's record in this case are past due. By postcard dated May 3, 2016, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated May 3, 2016, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. By letter dated August 10, 2016, we informed appellant the clerk's record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk's record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk's record or to provide written documentation she had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs.1 We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the clerk's record.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).
JUDGMENT
In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee IRMA GARZA recover her costs of this appeal from appellants SHARON LEE WALLACE-GARZA & ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS.
FOOTNOTES
1. By order dated May 3, 2016, we denied appellant's emergency motion and affidavit to stay enforcement of judgment pending appeal and motion for approval of a supersedeas bond set at zero dollars because appellant did not file a supersedeas bond or affidavit of inability to pay for a bond within ten days of the judgment pursuant to section 24.007 of the Texas Property Code. Appellant has not otherwise attempted to proceed without payment of costs.
CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 05-16-00516-CV
Decided: October 27, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)