IN RE: ARTURO SOLIS RELATOR (2016)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

IN RE: ARTURO SOLIS RELATOR

NO. 02-16-00461-CV

Decided: December 15, 2016

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

The court has considered Relator Arturo Solis's petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent Solis's petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against the Wichita County District Clerk, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction Solis's petition for writ of mandamus.

To the extent Solis's petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against the Twelfth Court of Appeals, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction Solis's petition for writ of mandamus.

To the extent Solis's petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against Judge Bert Richardson, we deny Solis's petition for writ of mandamus.

To the extent Solis's petition for writ of mandamus can be construed as seeking a writ of mandamus against the judges of the 30th District Court, the 78th District Court, and the 89th District Court of Wichita County, we deny Solis's petition for writ of mandamus.

And to the extent that Solis's petition for writ of mandamus seeks declaratory judgments from this court, we deny Solis's petition for writ of mandamus.

FOOTNOTES

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network