Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JEEVA ANANDHAM, Appellant v. AMBIKA ANANDHAM, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 7, 2016, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal was filed late, but within the extension time permitted by Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The appellant, Jeeva Anandham, did not respond to the Court's notices and did not file a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal.
The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. No motion for extension of time was timely filed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The Court finds it is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CHARLES KREGER Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 09-16-00361-CV
Decided: November 03, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)