JULIUS TABE v. TEXAS INPATIENT CONSULTANTS LLLP (2016)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Julius Tabe, filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal an interlocutory order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order granting partial summary judgment. Appellant's notice of appeal stated that the denial of his motion for reconsideration effectively denied his plea to the jurisdiction and motion to compel discovery.

Appellee, Texas Inpatient Consultants, subsequently filed a motion requesting that we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and grant sanctions pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 45 for the filing of a frivolous appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 45. Appellee asserts that we lack jurisdiction because (1) denial of a motion for reconsideration of partial summary judgment is not an appealable interlocutory order, (2) there is no order denying appellant's plea to the jurisdiction and, even if there was, the denial of a plea to the jurisdiction by a non-governmental party is not an appealable interlocutory order, and (3) there is no order denying appellant's motion to compel discovery and, even if there was, it would not be an appealable interlocutory order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE 51.014(a).

Twelve days after the filing of appellee's motion, appellant filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). In response, Texas Inpatients reiterates its request for sanctions.

We grant appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We deny the motion for sanctions. Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM