Aaron V. Bishop; Ronald J. Booker; Richard Burns; Albert Cortez, Jr.; Eric De Los Santos; Jovita Lopez; Aurelio Martinez; Norris McKenzie; Tomas Montez; Henry D. Moreno; Ricardo Pelayo; Jesse Prado; Oscar Ramirez; James Stanesic; Lester Vanzura; Roderick Wesley; and Monroe Yarbrough, Jr., Appellants v. The City of Austin, Appellee (2016)

ORDER

Appellants filed this interlocutory appeal challenging orders granting pleas to the jurisdiction in favor of the City of Austin in the underlying suit. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(a)(8). Trial court proceedings were automatically stayed. See id. § 51.014(b).

The parties filed a joint motion to lift the stay of trial court proceedings for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to sign an order on the City's objections to and motion to exclude testimony of plaintiffs'/appellants' expert, N. Shirlene Pearson, Ph.D. and for supplementation of the clerk's record in this appeal with the court's order. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a), 29.5. The parties agree that the order on the expert's testimony is relevant to this appeal and that the clerk's record in this appeal should be supplemented with that order.

We grant the parties' motion and lift the stay of trial court proceedings for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to sign an order on the City's objections to and motion to exclude testimony of N. Shirlene Pearson, Ph.D. and for supplementation of the clerk's record in this appeal with that order.

PER CURIAM