Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CHEMROCK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; Preferred Sands Sales, LLC; Preferred Pipeline, LLC; Preferred Sands of Wisconsin, LLC; Preferred Resin of Genoa, LLC; Shrieve Chemical Products, Inc.; and Thomas Petroleum, LLC; Appellants v. PEL-STATE BULK PLANT, LLC and Shell Western E&P, Inc., Appellees
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Two separate notices of appeal were filed in this appeal. In the first notice of appeal, Chemrock Technologies, LLC; Preferred Sands Sales, LLC; Preferred Pipeline, LLC; Preferred Sands of Wisconsin, LLC; Preferred Resin of Genoa, LLC; Shrieve Chemical Products, Inc.; and Thomas Petroleum, LLC appealed an order striking their petition in intervention. In the second notice of appeal, Shell Western E&P, Inc. appealed a final judgment rendered in favor of Pel-State Bulk Plant, LLC. We ordered the appeals to remain under the same appellate cause number; however, we ordered separate briefing on the matters challenged in the notices of appeal.
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss, stating that the matters in the intervention appeal have been resolved. We grant the motion, and dismiss the appeal of the order striking the petition in intervention. Because the motion does not disclose an agreement regarding the assessment of costs, costs are assessed against Chemrock Technologies, LLC; Preferred Sands Sales, LLC; Preferrred Pipeline, LLC; Preferred Sands of Wisconsin, LLC; Preferred Resin of Genoa, LLC; Shrieve Chemical Products, Inc.; and Thomas Petroleum, LLC. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (stating that absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the appellant).
Shell Western E&P, Inc.'s appeal challenging the final judgment rendered in favor of Pel-State Bulk Plant, LLC remains pending before the court.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 04-15-00750-CV
Decided: July 27, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)