Steven Robles, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee (2016)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

From our initial review of the record it appeared that appellant attempts to appeal in two separate and distinct criminal actions against him.  The first action arises from a criminal proceeding in Bexar County, in which appellant is represented by counsel and there is no final judgment or appealable order.  The second action arises from a criminal proceeding in federal court in the Western District of Texas.  It appears this court lacks jurisdiction in both actions reflected in the notice of appeal.

Therefore, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by April 18, 2016, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  On May 12, 2016, appellant filed a pro se response.  Appellant does not explain in his response the basis for this court's jurisdiction over the federal-court proceeding.  Appellant does not provide basis to assert appellate jurisdiction in this case or assert a final judgment has been entered.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a).

PER CURIAM