Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jerry Davis, Appellant v. Dallas County, City of Dallas, Dallas Independent School District, Dallas County Community College District, Dallas County School Equalization Fund, and Parkland Hospital District, Appellees
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant appeals from the trial court's judgment signed on January 25, 2016. In a letter dated March 25, 2016, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over the appeal because it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely. In that correspondence, we noted that the notice of appeal was filed within fifteen days of the deadline and we instructed appellant that he could cure the timeliness problem by filing, within ten days, a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 26.3. We cautioned appellant that failure to file an extension motion by April 8, 2016 may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As of today's date, appellant has not filed an extension motion.
If no post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable is filed, a notice of appeal is due thirty days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex.R.App. P. 26.1. An extension of time may be granted if an appellant files a notice of appeal within fifteen days of the deadline and files a motion complying with rule of appellate procedure 10.5(b). See Tex.R.App. P. 26.3, 10.5(b). Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. Tex.R.App. P. 25.1(b).
The trial court signed the judgment on January 25, 2016. Appellant did not file any post-judgment motion extending the appellate deadline. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due on February 24, 2016. See Tex.R.App. P. 26.1. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on February 25, 2016, one day past the deadline. Although given an opportunity to cure the timeliness problem by filing a motion for extension, appellant has failed to do so. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a).
Opinion by Justice Whitehill
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 05–16–00216–CV
Decided: May 17, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)