Allen F. Calton, Appellant v. G. Ekeke, Appellee (2016)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Allen F. Calton filed a notice of appeal of the trial court's denial of his “Motion for Preliminary Injunction.”  The clerk's record demonstrates that the initial relief requested was a temporary restraining order pending subsequent hearings on a temporary injunction and permanent mandatory injunctive relief, and the trial court treated the motion as an application for a temporary restraining order.  On April 6, 2016, we notified Calton that his appeal was subject to dismissal because the notice of appeal neither stated that a final order had been signed nor identified an interlocutory order for which an appeal was available.  In his response, Calton concedes he is appealing the denial of a temporary restraining order, but he argues the appeal may proceed as an appeal from the denial of a temporary injunction.

A temporary restraining order directs the conduct of a party pending imminent disposition of a request for a temporary injunction.  See In re Tex. Nat. Res. Conservation Comm'n, 85 S.W.3d 201, 205 (Tex.2002).  An interlocutory order on an application for a temporary restraining order is generally not an appealable order.  Rakowitz v. Bexar Cty. Sheriffs Dep't, No. 04–13–00093–CV, 2013 WL 2446725, at *1 (Tex. App—San Antonio June 5, 2013, no pet.) (mem.op.).  Calton's response does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.  This appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CHARLES KREGER Justice