Juan D. Calamease, Appellant v. The State of Texas, State (2016)

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

Pro se Appellant Juan D. Calamease attempts to appeal from the trial court's January 6, 2016 order denying his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.  On March 9, 2016, we notified Calamease of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order is not appealable.  See Morris v. State, No. 02–14–00351–CR, 2014 WL 7204558, at *1 (Tex.App.–Fort Worth Dec. 18,2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“The denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order.”);  see also Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex.Crim.App.2010) (providing that appropriate remedy for denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file an application for writ of mandamus in a court of appeals).  We informed him that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex.R.App. P. 44.3.  No response has been filed.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex.R.App. P. 43.2(f).

FOOTNOTES

1.   See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM