Arthur Edwin Bagby, Appellant v. The State of Texas, State (2016)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Arthur Edwin Bagby, Appellant v. The State of Texas, State

NO. 02–15–00224–CR

Decided: March 31, 2016

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” Although appellant did not sign the motion in compliance with rule of appellate procedure 42.2(a), appellant and his attorney each filed affidavits in this court on March 23, 2016, in support of the motion. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.2(a). Therefore, we suspend rule 42.2(a)'s requirement that appellant sign the motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex.R.App. P. 2. No decision of this court having been delivered before we received the motion and affidavits, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.2, 43.2(f).

FOOTNOTES

1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.

BONNIE SUDDERTH, JUSTICE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network