Christine E. Reule, Appellant v. LLC LP LP LLP AND RLZ (2015)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

Christine E. Reule, Appellant v. M & T Mortgage, M & T Bank, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Bayview Financial Trading Group, LP, Bayview Financial LP, Hughs, Watters, Askanase, LLP, Carolyn Taylor, Audrey Lewis, Jeff Leva, Sandy Dasigenis, AND RLZ INvestments, Inc., Appellees

NO. 14–13–00502–CV

Decided: October 29, 2015

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally

CONCURRING OPINION

I join the majority opinion and write separately in light of the dissenting opinion's contentions.

Christine Reule is entitled to appropriate and respectful treatment in the litigation process. So is the trial court. So are the appellees and their counsel. So are the jurors who fulfilled their civic duty; heard her case; and had the duration of their jury service prolonged by her conduct. So are other litigants—including other pro se litigants—seeking their share of finite court time and resources to obtain timely resolution of disputes important to their lives. The trial court acted with restraint, patience, and courtesy during the proceedings below when faced with challenging conduct that frequently was disruptive, dilatory, and disrespectful.

William J. Boyce, Justice

(McCally, J., majority) (Frost, C.J.dissenting).

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network