Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James Weldon Burton, Relator
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the court is a document filed by James Weldon Burton entitled “Relator's Request for Randall County District Attorney's File.” Given the nature of the relief sought, we construe the item as a petition for writ of mandamus. Because it seeks relief beyond our jurisdiction, however, we must deny it.
Burton requests that we “ORDER the Randall County District Attorney to provide and surrender a complete copy of the Randall County District Attorney's file and all evidence held in Cause No. 16,692–B․” This request is problematic for we generally cannot issue writs of mandamus against anyone other than a judge. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). While there is an exception to that limitation, however, it encompasses instances wherein relief is necessary to protect our appellate jurisdiction. In re Lagaite, No. 07–15–00101–CV, 2015 Tex.App. LEXIS 3565, at *1 (Tex.App.—Amarillo April 9, 2015) (orig. proceeding). Before it can be said that we are protecting our appellate jurisdiction, though, there must be an appeal pending wherein the relator is a party. Id. Burton's complaint does not relate to a pending appeal or to our jurisdiction over a pending appeal. Nor do we know of any authority allowing an appellate court to simply direct a district attorney to disclose his records to others. Thus, we have no jurisdiction to require the Randall County District Attorney to provide a complete copy of his file in Cause No. 16,692–B and deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.
Brian Quinn, Chief Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 07–15–00331–CV
Decided: September 10, 2015
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)