IN RE: Mother Doe and Father Doe (2015)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

IN RE: Mother Doe and Father Doe, Individually and as Next Friends of John Doe and Jane Doe, Relators

NO. 01–15–00692–CV

Decided: August 27, 2015

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Mother Doe and Father Doe, Individually and as Next Friends of John Doe and Jane Doe, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus, arguing that the trial court ¹ abused its discretion when it granted the real party in interest's Motion to Strike Adult Plaintiffs' Use of Pseudonyms.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We further deny the real party in interest's motion for sanctions.

FOOTNOTES

1. The respondent is the Honorable Theresa Chang of the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County. The underlying suit is Mother Doe and Father Doe, Individually and as Next Friends of John Doe and Jane Doe v. Beth Yeshurun Day School, No. 1045092 (County Civil Court at Law No. 2., Tex.).

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network