IN RE: Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod (2015)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

IN RE: Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod, Relators

No. 07–15–00235–CV

Decided: July 10, 2015

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the court is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q. Herrod. They request that we order the court reporter and the district clerk to provide them the appellate record in cause No. 07–15–00152–CV, the latter being an appeal pending before us. The clerk of this court mailed the appellate record to relators, which record was received, on June 11, 2015, by personnel at the prison wherein relators are housed. So, there is no need to order the trial court clerk and reporter to forward the same record. Thus, the complaint encompassed by the petition for mandamus is moot. However, we do not address whether the relators are entitled to a writ of mandamus against their jailers if the latter do not deliver the appellate record to relators; that happenstance has not been raised at this time.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network