Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The State of Texas, Appellant v. Eric Michael Heilman, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court granted habeas corpus relief to Eric Michael Heilman. State v. Heilman, 413 S.W.3d 503, 505 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 2013), rev'd, Ex parte Heilman, 456 S.W.3d 159 (Tex.Crim.App.2015). Heilman's application for writ of habeas corpus asserted that his plea was involuntary and he had received ineffective assistance of counsel. Id. Before the hearing on Heilman's application, the habeas court requested briefs from the parties on the issue of whether the prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations. Id. at 506. The trial court's order stated that the basis for granting habeas relief was the trial court's determination that Heilman's prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations. Id. The State appealed, and this Court affirmed the trial court's order. Id. at 509. The Court of Criminal Appeals granted the State's petition for discretionary review and held that Heilman's limitations defense was a forfeitable right and Heilman had waived his right to assert a limitations defense, and the Court remanded the case “to the court of appeals to assess Heilman's other claims.” Ex parte Heilman, 456 S.W.3d at 160, 169.
After the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the case to this Court, we gave the parties an opportunity to raise additional arguments, and the parties declined to do so. The trial court has not yet addressed Heilman's remaining claims. In accordance with the mandate from the Court of Criminal Appeals, we remand the cause to the trial court.
REMANDED.
LEANNE JOHNSON, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 09–12–00505–CR
Decided: June 24, 2015
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)