Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Myra Morris, Kleberg County Attorney Kira Talip, and Kleberg County Judge Rudy Madrid, Appellants, v. Corina Madrigal, Appellee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Myra Morris, Kleberg County Attorney Kira Talip, and Kleberg County Judge Rudy Madrid seek to appeal a March 23, 2015 order granting a petition for depositions under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 202. Currently before the Court is appellants' “Supplemental Statement Concerning Jurisdiction,” which states that on March 28, 2015, the trial court signed an order vacating the March 23, 2015 order subject to appeal in this cause. Appellants state that the trial court's March 28, 2015 order may have divested the Court of subject-matter jurisdiction over this appeal.
Because the trial court has vacated the order subject to appeal, we conclude that this appeal has been rendered moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex.2005) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings ․”); Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex.2001) (noting that “a controversy must exist between the parties at every stage of the legal proceeding, including the appeal” and that, if controversy ceases to exist, case becomes moot); State Bar of Tex. v. Gomez, 891 S.W.2d 243, 245 (Tex.1994) (stating that, for a controversy to be justiciable, there must be a real controversy between the parties that will be actually resolved by the judicial relief sought). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. See Heckman v. Williamson Cnty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex.2012); see also Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a).
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NUMBER 13–15–00203–CV
Decided: June 11, 2015
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)