Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gayland Decloyce Williams, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement with the State, Appellant, Gayland Decloyce Williams, pleaded guilty to the offense of evading arrest with a vehicle. Appellant, his counsel, and counsel for the State signed various documents relating to the plea, including an agreed punishment recommendation of imprisonment for ten years. In accordance with the plea agreement, the trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for ten years. The trial court also certified to this court that this is a plea bargain case, and Appellant has no right to appeal. The certification is signed by the trial court, Appellant, and Appellant's counsel. See Tex. R. App. P.P. 25.2(a)(2).
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) limits a defendant's right to appeal in a plea bargain case when he pleads guilty and his punishment does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See Tex. R. App. P.P. 25.2(a)(2). Under those circumstances, the defendant may appeal only (1) matters raised by written motion and ruled on before trial or (2) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal. Id. Here, the trial court did not give Appellant permission to appeal, and Appellant did not file any pretrial motions. Therefore, we conclude that the certification of the right of appeal filed by the trial court is supported by the record and that Appellant has no right to appeal.1 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal “without further action.” See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.Crim.App.2006).
FOOTNOTES
1. Under the terms of the plea bargain agreement, Appellant expressly waived the right to appeal.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 12–15–00065–CR
Decided: May 20, 2015
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)