Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tommy Lee Flemon, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Tommy Lee Flemon (Flemon) 1 pleaded guilty to the second-degree felony offense of indecency with a child, enhanced by a prior felony conviction. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1), (d) (West 2011); § 12.42(b) (West Supp.2014) 2 . The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Flemon guilty, but deferred further proceedings and placed Flemon on community supervision for ten years and assessed a $1,000 fine. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Flemon's unadjudicated community supervision. Flemon pleaded “true” to the alleged violations of the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found that Flemon violated the conditions of his community supervision, and that Flemon was guilty of indecency with a child. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years of confinement.
Flemon's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). On January 20, 2015, we granted an extension of time for Flemon to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Flemon. We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order the appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.3
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. On the judgment from which he appeals, Flemon is identified as “Tommy Flemon AKA Tommy Lee Flemon[.]”
2. We cite to the current version of the statute as the subsequent amendments do not affect the outcome of this appeal.
3. Flemon may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex.R.App. P. 68.
LEANNE JOHNSON, Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 09–14–00474–CR
Decided: May 06, 2015
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)