Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Justin Chisum, Relator
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before this Court is a petition for writ of mandamus filed on behalf of Justin Chisum. He requests that we issue a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable William Eichman II, to enter an order staying grand jury proceedings pertaining to criminal accusations pending against him. We deny the petition as moot.
In February 2015, Chisum was arraigned for the murder of his four year old daughter.1 In March, his attorneys filed a Suggestion of Competency and a trial court entered an Order for Examination Regarding Incompetency. After a court-appointed psychologist examined Chisum and, by affidavit, opined him to be not currently competent to proceed in defense of his case, Chisum filed a motion seeking to stay grand jury proceedings because he believed the district attorney intended to present his case to the grand jury on the morning of April 16. The trial court held a hearing on April 15 and denied the motion. That same day, Chisum filed with this Court his Petition for Writ of Mandamus and an Emergency Motion for a Stay of Proceedings. On April 16, we denied the motion seeking an emergency stay of the grand jury proceedings.
Pursuant to an inquiry by the Clerk of the Court, it has now come to our attention that the criminal accusations pending against Chisum have been presented to the grand jury and that an indictment has been returned. Because the relief being sought by his petition for writ of mandamus has now become moot, the petition is denied.
FOOTNOTES
1. Although Chisum never specifically states as much, we assume the arraignment was pursuant to an information based upon complaint. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 21.22.
Patrick A. Pirtle, Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 07–15–00169–CV
Decided: May 04, 2015
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)