IN RE: Steven Pryor (2014)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

IN RE: Steven Pryor, Relator

No. 05–14–01534–CV

Decided: December 16, 2014

Before Justices Lang–Miers, Myers, and Stoddart

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial court to enforce its September 16, 2014 Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce the Court's January 16, 2013 Order Compelling the Parties to Proceed with Share Valuation and Buyout of Steve Pryor's Shares. The facts and issues are well-known to the parties, so we do not recount them here. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex.2004) (orig.proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude the relator has failed to establish a right to relief. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Opinion by Justice Stoddart

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network