LEVEE v. LEVEE (2014)

Court of Appeals of Texas,Fort Worth.

Theodore Floyd LEVEE, Appellant v. Cathey June LEVEE, Appellee.

No. 02–12–00392–CV.

Decided: February 20, 2014

Panel: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

Theodore Floyd Levee, pro se. Charles F. Holmans, for Cathey June Levee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT

On January 17, 2014, we struck appellant's November 18, 2013 brief for noncompliance with the rules of appellate procedure, after having given appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure the defects. See Tex.R.App. P. 9.1(b), 9.4(h)-(i), 9.5(d), 38.1(a)-(c), (e)-(k), 38.9(a). We warned appellant that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court an amended brief complying with the cited rules and a reasonable explanation of the failure to file such a brief. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have not received any response.

Because appellant has not filed a compliant brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

FOOTNOTES

1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network