APPELLANT v. APPELLEE (2013)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Joe L. Reece APPELLANT v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee Successor in Interest To Bank of America, National Association as Trustee, as Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank National Association AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST MORTGAGE PASS–THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005–2, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS APPELLEE

NO. 02–12–00427–CV

Decided: May 30, 2013

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

On April 29, 2013, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex.R.App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension. See Tex.R.App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We received a response from appellant, but it does not explain his failure to file a brief or the need for an extension.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

FOOTNOTES

FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network