Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Paul Roman Govea, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Pro se appellant Paul Roman Govea appeals from the district court's order denying his petitions for writ of error coram nobis and for writ of audita querela. We affirm the order.
The purpose of a writ of error coram nobis is to bring before the court rendering the judgment matters of fact which, if known at the time the judgment was rendered, would have prevented its rendition. Ex parte McKenzie, 29 S.W.2d 771, 772 (Tex.Crim.App.1930) (citation omitted). This common law writ is not recognized in this state. See Ex parte Massey, 249 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex.Crim.App.1952). The habeas corpus procedure set out in article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides the exclusive remedy for felony post-conviction relief in state court. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp.2011). Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. §§ 3, 5; Hoang v. State, 872 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex.Crim.App.1993) (only court of criminal appeals has authority to grant post-conviction relief from final felony convictions).
Govea also attempts to set aside the judgment against him by way of a writ of audita querela. Audita querela is, or was, a “writ available to a judgment debtor who seeks a rehearing of a matter on grounds of newly discovered evidence or newly existing defenses.” Black's Law Dictionary 126 (9th ed.2009). Because the habeas corpus procedure is the exclusive means to set aside a prior felony conviction in a collateral proceeding, the writ of audita querela is likewise not available in Texas. See Ex parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex.App.—Waco 2006, no pet.) (dismissing appeal based on writ of audita querela); McBride v. State, 114 S.W.3d 556, 557 (Tex.App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (affirming district court's dismissal of petition for writ of audita querela).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying Govea's petitions.
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 03–12–00118–CR
Decided: August 29, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)