Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RASHUN MAURICE MOCK, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion By Justice Moseley
Rashun Maurice Mock pleaded guilty to two aggravated robbery charges. Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, the trial court assessed punishment at seven years' imprisonment in each case and assessed a $3,000 fine in cause no. 05–12–01032–CR.1 The Court has before it the State's August 8, 2012 motion to dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. We agree we lack jurisdiction over the appeals.
Appellant waived his right to appeal in conjunction with the plea agreements. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 218–20 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). The trial court certified that the cases involve plea bargains and appellant has no right to appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15 (Tex.Crim.App.2005). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
Tex.R.App. P. 47
121032F.U05
S
Court of AppealsFifth District of Texas at DallasJUDGMENT
RASHUN MAURICE MOCK, Appellant
No. 05–12–01032–CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, AppelleeAppeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No.F11–21069–T).
Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Justices Morris and Myers participating. Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered August 27, 2012.
/Jim Moseley/
JIM MOSELEY
JUSTICE
S
Court of AppealsFifth District of Texas at DallasJUDGMENT
RASHUN MAURICE MOCK, Appellant
No. 05–12–01033–CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, AppelleeAppeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No.F11–21274–T).
Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Justices Morris and Myers participating. Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered August 27, 2012.
/Jim Moseley/
JIM MOSELEY
JUSTICE
FOOTNOTES
FN1. The plea agreement for cause no. 05–12–01033–CR also includes a $3,000 fine, but the trial court's judgment does not reflect that a fine was imposed in that case.. FN1. The plea agreement for cause no. 05–12–01033–CR also includes a $3,000 fine, but the trial court's judgment does not reflect that a fine was imposed in that case.
JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 05–12–01032–CR
Decided: August 27, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)