Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WILLIE SALAZAR GARCIA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion By Justice Lang
A jury found Willie Salazar Garcia guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Thereafter, appellant and the State entered in a plea agreement in which appellant pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs and they agreed punishment would be assessed at twenty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant acknowledged orally to the trial court that in conjunction with the punishment agreement, he was waiving his right to appeal the conviction. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). The trial court sentenced appellant in accordance with the plea agreement and certified that appellant waived his right to appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(d), Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15 (Tex.Crim.App.2005).
In response to appellant's motion, this Court abated the appeal to allow appellant to ask the trial judge to grant permission to appeal. Following a hearing, the trial judge denied appellant permission to appeal. Appellant's waiver of his right to appeal leaves us without jurisdiction over the appeal. See Blanco, 18 S.W.3d at 220.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
S
Court of AppealsFifth District of Texas at DallasJUDGMENT
WILLIE SALAZAR GARCIA, Appellant
No. 05–10–00779–CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, AppelleeAppeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No.F09–33682–M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Bridges and FitzGerald participating. Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered March 30, 2012.
/Douglas S. Lang/
DOUGLAS S. LANG
JUSTICE
DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 05–10–00779–CR
Decided: March 30, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)