Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Willie Edward Davis, Appellant v. Dan Lammar Cogdell and George Allen Gooling, Appellees
MEMORANDUM Opinion
Willie Edward Davis, a prison inmate, appeals the adverse judgment rendered against him on January 6, 2012. By letter dated February 23, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Davis that the clerk's record had not been filed because he had either failed to pay or make arrangement to pay the clerk's fee for preparation of the clerk's record. The Clerk also warned Davis that, unless he paid or made arrangement to pay the clerk's fee for preparation of the clerk's record and notify the Court of the actions taken within 21 days from the date of the letter, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App. P. 37.3(b). More than 21 days have passed, and Davis has not made arrangement to pay the clerk's fee for preparation of the clerk's record and has not notified the Court of the actions taken.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Id.
Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. Tex.R.App. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to Tex.R.App. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also Tex.R.App. P. 5; 10th Tex.App. (Waco) Loc. R. 5; Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (West 2005); and § 51.208 (West Supp.2011). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. Tex.R.App. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed.
[CV06]
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 10–12–00023–CV
Decided: March 28, 2012
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)