Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jasmine Charmaine Herndon, Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After appellant filed her notice of appeal, the clerk's record was filed in this Court on January 7, 2011, and the reporter's record was filed on February 10, 2011. Appellant's appointed counsel filed and was granted two motions for extension of time to file the brief. On April 4, 2011, the trial court signed an order allowing counsel to withdraw from the case. The order does not reflect that new counsel was appointed, nor does it include a finding that appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant, who is apparently now pro se, has not responded to our notice informing her that her brief was overdue.
The appeal is therefore abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant still wishes to pursue her appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether new appellate counsel should be appointed to continue the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(2); In re T.V., 8 S.W.3d 448, 449–50 (Tex.App.—Waco 1999, order) (holding that to adequately protect indigent parent's rights in termination case, court should abate appeal to allow trial court to hold hearing to determine issues raised in Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)); see also Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)(3). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations, and a supplemental record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter's notes, shall be forwarded to the clerk of this Court no later than January 18, 2012. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
Abated
David Puryear, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 03–11–00030–CV
Decided: December 13, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)