ILDEFONSO FONSO CISNEROS v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (2011)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

ILDEFONSO FONSO CISNEROS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. 05–11–01464–CR

Decided: December 19, 2011

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion By Chief Justice Wright

Ildefonso Fonso Cisneros pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery and true to one enhancement paragraph. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial judge assessed punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment and a $3000 fine. The rule 25.2(d) certification, which states the case involves a plea bargain and appellant has no right to appeal, is supported by the record.¹ See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15 (Tex.Crim.App.2005).

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Tex.R.App. P. 47

111464F.U05

FOOTNOTES

FN1. Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief asserting the record showed no arguable error. Because we have no jurisdiction over the appeal, we do not review the record for arguable error.. FN1. Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief asserting the record showed no arguable error. Because we have no jurisdiction over the appeal, we do not review the record for arguable error.

CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network