Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Cheryl Rogers and Don Rogers, Appellants v. City of Austin and Delta Air Lines, Inc., Appellees
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellants Cheryl Rogers and Don Rogers appeal the trial court's order granting summary judgment for appellee Delta Air Lines, Inc. Appellants have filed a motion to abate their appeal with this Court. They state that the order is not a final appealable order because it was not severed from claims for contribution that exist between Delta and appellee the City of Austin. See Teer v. Duddlesten, 664 S.W.2d 702, 703–04 (Tex.1984) (without severance, summary judgment which does not dispose of all parties and issues is interlocutory and not appealable). Appellants also certify that appellees do not oppose their motion to abate.
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2 provides that an appellate court may permit a party to cure a prematurely filed appeal by allowing “an appealed order that is not final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.” Tex.R.App. P. 27.2. We, therefore, grant appellants' motion to abate this appeal to give them 60 days after the date of this order to take action to cure the jurisdictional defect and to pay for and request a supplemental clerk's record containing a signed order of severance or an order otherwise disposing of remaining claims. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a); Iacono v. Lyons, 6 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, order).
Abated
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 03–11–00563–CV
Decided: October 18, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)