Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael Anthony Moore
MEMORANDUM Opinion
Michael Anthony Moore, a prison inmate, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Marc Hamlin, District Clerk of Brazos County, to provide information Moore requested and to return a file stamped copy of a letter and request for a docket sheet. Moore also seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Travis B. Bryan, III, Judge of the 272nd Judicial District Court, to rule on Moore's motion to recuse Judge Bryan and Moore's motion for DNA testing. It appears both motions may have been pending since June 6, 2011.
There are numerous procedural problems with this petition including, but not limited to, 1) the petition was not served on the real party in interest, Tex.R.App. P. 9.5; 52.2; 2) Moore is trying to mandamus a judge he has sought to recuse; 3) Moore has not shown that he presented those motions to the trial court, see In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding); and 4) Moore has not attached any document on which his petition relies. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.3(k). However, we use Rule 2 to look past these and the other deficiencies and dispose of Moore's petition. Tex.R.App. P. 2.
We deny Moore's petition as to the District Clerk because the allegations as to the Clerk do not have the effect of interfering with our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (West 2004).
Further, we deny Moore's petition as to the trial court because three months is not sufficient time to say the trial court has abused its discretion, especially when the motion to recuse must be acted on before the motion for DNA testing. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 18a(c); In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d at 229.
[OT06]
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 10–11–00336–CR
Decided: September 21, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)