Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JAIME HERNANDEZ MUNIZ, RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Jamie Hernandez Muniz, a prison inmate appearing pro se, has filed a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus 2 and a petition for writ of mandamus. In his petition, relator complains that the trial court denied him due process of law by signing orders directing withdrawal of funds from his trust account. For the reasons that follow, we will deny relator's petition.
Relator has not filed a record or appendix with his petition. In an original mandamus proceeding, the petition must be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to a relator's claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.7(a)(1). Additionally, the petition states facts not supported by evidence included in an appendix or record. A relator's burden on mandamus includes meeting the requirement that “[e]very statement of fact in the petition [is] supported by citation to competent evidence included in the appendix or record.” Tex.R.App. P. 52.3(g). In short, a relator must supply a record sufficient to establish the right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.1992). Relator has not done so and we are therefore unable to determine whether he is entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied and his motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. In denying relator's petition, we express no opinion on the merits of his complaint, or whether it is properly reviewable by petition for writ of mandamus. See Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315, 321 (Tex.2009) (holding appellate review of a trial court's order denying an inmate's motion challenging a withdrawal order is by appeal).
FOOTNOTES
FN2. Motions for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus are no longer required. Tex.R.App. P. 52.1 Notes and Comments.. FN2. Motions for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus are no longer required. Tex.R.App. P. 52.1 Notes and Comments.
James T. Campbell Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 07–11–00322–CV
Decided: August 24, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)