IN RE: MARK MAHONEY AND KAREN GRIFFIN (2011)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

IN RE: MARK MAHONEY AND KAREN GRIFFIN, Relators

No. 05–11–01055–CV

Decided: August 15, 2011

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Moseley and Fillmore

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice Moseley

Relators contend the trial judge erred by rendering an order requiring them to appear in response to subpoenas after relators filed a motion for protective order in Ellis County. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. We conclude relators' petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus. The stay issued by this Court on August 12, 2011 shall remain in effect until 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 17, 2011.

111055F.P05

JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network