Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jesus Almanza, d/b/a Jesse Almanza Concrete, Appellant v. Tracie “ Oehler “ Keller d/b/a Oehler Properties and Charles Thomas, Individually and as Charles Thomas Homes, Appellees
MEMORANDUM Opinion
Jesus Almanza sued Tracie “Oehler” Keller and Charles Thomas. Thomas filed a motion for partial summary judgment which the trial court granted.1 Almanza appeals the trial court's order.
By letter dated June 14, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Almanza that his appeal was subject to dismissal because the order did not appear to be a final, appealable order. Almanza was also warned that the appeal would be dismissed, unless within 21 days from the date of the letter, Almanza filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Almanza filed a response but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. He contends that the trial court granted more relief than requested, and accordingly, the order could be reversed and remanded.
As a general rule, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.2001). An order or judgment is final when it disposes of all parties and claims. Id. at 205. The order Almanza attempts to appeal does not dispose of Thomas's claims against Almanza. (“This Partial Summary judgment is not final as to any claims of Defendant THOMAS against Plaintiff Jesus Almanza d/b/a/ Jesse Almanza Concrete.”)
Accordingly, the trial court's order granting partial summary judgment is not final, and Almanza may not appeal that order at this time.
This appeal is dismissed. Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a).
[CV06]
FOOTNOTES
FN1. Almanza's claims against Keller were previously dismissed, but Keller's claims against Almanza have not been dismissed. See Almanza v. Keller, No. 10–10–00419–CR, 2011 Tex.App. LEXIS 405 (Tex.App.—Waco Jan. 19, 2011, no pet.). FN1. Almanza's claims against Keller were previously dismissed, but Keller's claims against Almanza have not been dismissed. See Almanza v. Keller, No. 10–10–00419–CR, 2011 Tex.App. LEXIS 405 (Tex.App.—Waco Jan. 19, 2011, no pet.)
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 10–11–00159–CV
Decided: July 20, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)