IN RE: LEE C. RITCHIE (2011)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

IN RE: LEE C. RITCHIE, AS DIRECTOR OF RUPE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE DALLAS GORDON RUPE TRUST, PAULA

No. 05–11–00544–CV

Decided: May 31, 2011

Before Justices Bridges, FitzGerald, and Murphy

RUPE DENNARD, AS DIRECTOR OF RUPE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE DALLAS GORDON RUPE TRUST AND AS

TRUSTEE FOR THE PAULA DENNARD MANAGEMENT TRUST,

DENNIS LUTES, AS DIRECTOR OF RUPE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE PAULA DENNARD MANAGEMENT

TRUST, AND RUPE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Relators

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice Murphy

Relators contend the trial judge erred in denying their motion to release supersedeas bond and cash deposits. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex.1992) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus.

110544F.P05

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network