Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GREGORY THOMAS DICKERSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Memorandum Opinion
Gregory Thomas Dickerson appeals, pro se, from an order of the trial court denying his motion to set aside and vacate what he considers to be a void 1991 judgment convicting him of aggravated sexual assault.1 We modify it and affirm.
Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant relief from a final felony conviction imposing a penalty other than death, and one seeking such relief must do so per art. 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp.2010); 2 Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (stating that the Court of Criminal Appeals is the only court with jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings); Ex parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex.App.–Waco 2006, no pet.) (stating that the exclusive post-conviction remedy in a final felony conviction is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to art. 11.07). Thus, the trial court had no jurisdiction to entertain appellant's motion to set aside or vacate his 1991 final felony conviction.
Accordingly, we modify the trial court's order to reflect that the motion was dismissed for want of jurisdiction and affirm it as modified.
FOOTNOTES
FN1. Appellant appealed that judgment alleging he received ineffective assistance of counsel. That judgment was affirmed by this court on August 26, 1992.. FN1. Appellant appealed that judgment alleging he received ineffective assistance of counsel. That judgment was affirmed by this court on August 26, 1992.
FN2. Although the application for writ of habeas corpus is filed in the trial court, it is made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3(b) (Vernon Supp.2010).. FN2. Although the application for writ of habeas corpus is filed in the trial court, it is made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3(b) (Vernon Supp.2010).
Brian Quinn Chief Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 07–10–0473–CR
Decided: May 03, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)