IN RE: ANGELA MEDRANO AND RICARDO MEDRANO (2011)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

IN RE: ANGELA MEDRANO AND RICARDO MEDRANO, JR., Relators

No. 05–11–00430–CV

Decided: April 12, 2011

Before Justices Moseley, Richter, and Fillmore

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Relators contend the trial court violated a ministerial duty in denying their motion to quash certain grand jury subpoenas. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320–21 (Tex.Crim.App.2009) (orig.proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App.2001) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay.

110430F.P05

ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network