IN RE: ATAUYO UMONDAK (2011)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

IN RE: ATAUYO UMONDAK, Relator

No. 05–11–00398–CV

Decided: April 08, 2011

Before Justices Moseley, Richter, and Fillmore

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion By Justice Fillmore

Before the Court is relator's petition for writ of mandamus requesting relief in relation to his post conviction writ of habeas corpus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court has no jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings under article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. Art. 11.07 (West Supp.2010); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex.App.—Houston [1 st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

110398F.P05

ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network